Author: Capt. Obvious
Time: February 15, 2008 - 11:44 am
and the highest ranked school who offered him $$$ was U of Ten., a state school, which may just be offering him in state tuition. Stop crying NJ boy, black people are not why you failed in life.
ah, the 'shame' talking point, a common propaganda technique disseminated by the rightwing and pseudoleftist think tanks and nonprofits. All calculated to engender the Most Holy Race to the Bottom that the neoliberal regime craves.
The idea is to shame the less successful white male into turning away from racial solidarity and embracing the diversity-multiculti propaganda regime. No one wants to be seen as or think of themselves as unsuccessful, second best, a runner up, a loser. And that is what this particular neoliberal 'shame' tactic is aimed at--the idea being that if you do not embrace affirmative action, multiculturalism, mass immigration, identity politics, etc, then you are rejecting it because you are a jealous loser.
The lower class white male is the whipping boy of the pseudoleftist neoliberals. And he is what the rich most fear. If the lower class white male ever sees a political path clear to populist economic leftism (as is practiced in western europe), the elite here in America will have to pay much more in taxes.
Friday, February 15, 2008
The Neoliberal Elite try to shame the lower class white male into embracing multiculti, even tho it damages him
Monday, February 4, 2008
Why White Pride is Taboo, Yet Black Pride is Encouraged.
In another forum, someone wrote :
I really do not see what any history of white slavery in and of itself has to do with this why blacks can listen to music that is all about black pride, and yet it is taboo for whites to do the same .
I can appreciate that it is not obvious. But understand that white slavery is in many ways the core of the american culture. It is the bedrock of the american soul, and it is hidden s away in many ways. The fact that AUSTRALIA was founded as a slave labor camp for whites underscores the core of Australia. THey are well aware of their own beginnings. That knowledge informs their national culture.
But Americans are not aware of their own beginnings. Oh, perhaps many are, in a distant and academic way. But not really. And yet there were FAR more white slaves here in america than in australia. You doubt they were slaves? Watch the video links I posted above.
Why does this fact of white slave beginnings not inform and form the basis of American culture? THat question is key to this discussion.
Every aspect of animal life and the science of the social animal is bound up in beginnings, in heritage, in DNA itself.
If you raise up the child a certain way, it will not depart from that way as an adult. That saying is a very old saying, and one that takes many different forms. Folk wisdom, that, and oh so true. The child is the father to the man. As the child is molded, so is born the adult.
It was not so long ago, that era of white slavery. It started in 1609, and started to die out in about 1700, and was pretty much dead by 1850 or so. That was not so long ago. My father was born in 1931 and is still alive. Mother Jones, the labor activist, died in 1935. She could have known my father as a child. Their lives could have touched. Mother Jones said she was born in 1835. That made her 100 years old when she died.
James Madison, the Father of the Constitution and the third american president, died in 1835 at the age of 85. He was born in 1750. He could have known the infant Mother JOnes.
Madison's aristocratic ancestors who were living when he was born went back right to the core of the 1600s, the core time of white slavery. Madison sold Jefferson an indentured servant who may have been a white slave. Certainly, madison\'s father and grandfather owned white slaves.
THat is 4 lives from today to the time of the white slaves. Four lives from then to today. Not so far away.
So, what else is important about white slaves? If you read the links I gave you, you should start to understand something about how and why the races were divided in America, and why the skin color caste was created in the first place.
As the links below show, the plantation owners of Virginia and Maryland knew they had trouble on their hands when a mixed race rebellion burned Jamestown virginia to the ground in about 1678. The upper class planters ruled over a lower class composed of white slaves, free whites who were mostly former white slaves, and chattel and indentured and free blacks. THis lower class is what rebelled in the Bacon Rebellion that burned Jamestown.
People think that economic leftism and socialism itself was born of the early 1900s. Oh no. It was born much earlier. Really, it started to burn in the late 1600s. THe Bacon Rebellion, Shays\' Rebellion, the Whiskey Rebellion and even the French Revolution of the late 1700s were ALL the expression of burgeoning populist economic leftism.
THe poor whites made up the mass of the lower class in Virginia and Maryland in the late 1600s. That largest bloc was what was crucial for the planters to control in order to maintain their position. So, in order to control that largest bloc of lower class whites, the upper class in colonial america decided to divide and rule the lower class whites from the blacks. They wanted to set them against each other. So the upper class used the power of the government to divide and rule. The politicians at that time were elected by the upper class. In order to vote, one had to own substantial property. So the lower class did not elect the politicians.
In order to divide the lower class black against white, the planters created laws that would raise the poor whites up in social status and tie them by skin color to the upper class, which was mostly white. As the historian Dr Morgan wrote, the planters separated poor whites from blacks by a "screen of racial comtempt." How did they do this? What laws were used? For example, laws that forbade poor whites and blacks to gather socially or to have children together. Also, blacks were forbidden to defend themselves physically from whites.
These laws created a new underclass of blacks. Previously, it was just money that defined the underclass. But by 1700, by force of laws created by the upper class, skin color defined social status. This was done for the express purpose of dividing and ruling the lower classes.
And the planters of virginia and maryland simply followed the example of the massive plantation colonies of the Caribbean. The upper class there had already had the same issues --poor white slaves and black slaves rebelling against the elite.
Now, that separation of the lower classes by the upper class defined american culture in a major way.
Eventually the white majority defeated chattel slavery in America.
And now the elite depend mainly on cheap imported labor to keep wages low and profits high.
But the elite of America still desire to divide the lower classes against each other. This is a natural desire. And part of how that is done is by use of the social status that white skin gives even lower class whites today. WEB Dubois called this added social status of whites a \"psychological wage.\" The elevated social status of white skin that still lingers from the infancy of america, that social status dividend helps keep the largest bloc of Americans--lower middle class whites--happy. It keeps them feeling that they are above the nonwhites.
Also, it keeps the lower middle class whites from joining politically with nonwhites. Divide et Impera has always been the core maxim for the upper class.
And lower middle class and lower class whites are still the major electoral force in America. Look at the census maps of america. You will see that aside from the east and west coast megacities, there are two hearts in america: one is the german heart that stretches from Pennsylvania through to around chicago. THe largest group here is white and mainly from germany, in terms of cultural and genealogical descent. This heart of America is really like a large city or tribe.
The other American heart is the Scots-Irish heart. It reaches from around west virginia down to around georgia-alabama area and forms a mega-tribe in a circle around the appalachian mountains. This white tribe-city is mainly descended from runaway white slaves.
These maps show what I mean:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Census-2000-Data-Top-US-Ancestries-by-County.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:USA-2000-population-density.gif
One major force in dividing up the lower class today is maintaining same racial divisions, even while forcing integration in the workforce in order to keep wages low though use of imported nonwhite labor.
Economic Leftist Populism is what the upper class fear, then as now. If the upper class can keep the white lower class majority from uniting and \"finding their common interests\" (to quote James Madison), they will better be able to keep away economic leftism populism.
Recall that I asked you why the fur of canadian foxes is thicker than fox fur in the South. Because northern foxes have evolved to have long fur in order to protect them from the cold, right? How does this happen? Is there a conspiracy to make northern fox fur thicker? Or is their fur a product of various forces exerted upon generations of foxes by the environment? Yes, the foxes evolved, and their fur is a result of these forces exerted by their external environment.
The same sort of dynamic is at play here in America. THe forces here are many and varied. But although all animals are created equal, some animals are more equal than others. Likewise, in america, some forces are stronger than others, and these strong forces have a much greater effect on our american culture.
Keep in mind what the elite would naturally desire, as they have always desired: a mixed population, separated by race and social status, with tensions between the factions, but integrated throughly in the work force and in the electorate, the better to stifle solidarity.
THAT is the fox fur we wear. And it is not the product of a conspiracy, but instead it is an evolved culture, a situation, a milieu, a mise en scene, a tableau, a dynamic--an ECOSYSTEM.
The forces of the elite are facilitated and aided and abetted by history and by the undemocratic American Constitution. This Constitution allows the forces of the rich and powerful to be better exerted, to make themselves more powerful. Those forces have evolved so as to do many things that favor the elite: stifle racial solidarity among the white lower class plurality (hence the unspoken taboo against white racial pride); engender and maintain racial tension (hence multiculturalism, political correctness, affirmative action shoved in the face of the white lower middle class); the sub rosa demonization of the whites, in particular the white blue collar male (aka The Evil Redneck).
All these cultural landmark are the products of forces exerted by the rich and powerful over decades, exerted in a number of ways, through nonprofit propaganda outlets such as the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, which have directly and indirectly created the PseudoLeftist propaganda regime, and through electoral politics, etc etc etc.
That is the fox fur we wear.
It is not a conspiracy. It is an ecosystem. Homo Sapiens is not separated from nature, not yet;, we are part and parcel of it. And this is our ecosystem, the ecosystem of Homo Sapiens Americanus.
Some links to support what I am saying:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kn2T6WKuEc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiEeok1EEl0&feature=related
I really do not see what any history of white slavery in and of itself has to do with this why blacks can listen to music that is all about black pride, and yet it is taboo for whites to do the same .
I can appreciate that it is not obvious. But understand that white slavery is in many ways the core of the american culture. It is the bedrock of the american soul, and it is hidden s away in many ways. The fact that AUSTRALIA was founded as a slave labor camp for whites underscores the core of Australia. THey are well aware of their own beginnings. That knowledge informs their national culture.
But Americans are not aware of their own beginnings. Oh, perhaps many are, in a distant and academic way. But not really. And yet there were FAR more white slaves here in america than in australia. You doubt they were slaves? Watch the video links I posted above.
Why does this fact of white slave beginnings not inform and form the basis of American culture? THat question is key to this discussion.
Every aspect of animal life and the science of the social animal is bound up in beginnings, in heritage, in DNA itself.
If you raise up the child a certain way, it will not depart from that way as an adult. That saying is a very old saying, and one that takes many different forms. Folk wisdom, that, and oh so true. The child is the father to the man. As the child is molded, so is born the adult.
It was not so long ago, that era of white slavery. It started in 1609, and started to die out in about 1700, and was pretty much dead by 1850 or so. That was not so long ago. My father was born in 1931 and is still alive. Mother Jones, the labor activist, died in 1935. She could have known my father as a child. Their lives could have touched. Mother Jones said she was born in 1835. That made her 100 years old when she died.
James Madison, the Father of the Constitution and the third american president, died in 1835 at the age of 85. He was born in 1750. He could have known the infant Mother JOnes.
Madison's aristocratic ancestors who were living when he was born went back right to the core of the 1600s, the core time of white slavery. Madison sold Jefferson an indentured servant who may have been a white slave. Certainly, madison\'s father and grandfather owned white slaves.
THat is 4 lives from today to the time of the white slaves. Four lives from then to today. Not so far away.
So, what else is important about white slaves? If you read the links I gave you, you should start to understand something about how and why the races were divided in America, and why the skin color caste was created in the first place.
As the links below show, the plantation owners of Virginia and Maryland knew they had trouble on their hands when a mixed race rebellion burned Jamestown virginia to the ground in about 1678. The upper class planters ruled over a lower class composed of white slaves, free whites who were mostly former white slaves, and chattel and indentured and free blacks. THis lower class is what rebelled in the Bacon Rebellion that burned Jamestown.
People think that economic leftism and socialism itself was born of the early 1900s. Oh no. It was born much earlier. Really, it started to burn in the late 1600s. THe Bacon Rebellion, Shays\' Rebellion, the Whiskey Rebellion and even the French Revolution of the late 1700s were ALL the expression of burgeoning populist economic leftism.
THe poor whites made up the mass of the lower class in Virginia and Maryland in the late 1600s. That largest bloc was what was crucial for the planters to control in order to maintain their position. So, in order to control that largest bloc of lower class whites, the upper class in colonial america decided to divide and rule the lower class whites from the blacks. They wanted to set them against each other. So the upper class used the power of the government to divide and rule. The politicians at that time were elected by the upper class. In order to vote, one had to own substantial property. So the lower class did not elect the politicians.
In order to divide the lower class black against white, the planters created laws that would raise the poor whites up in social status and tie them by skin color to the upper class, which was mostly white. As the historian Dr Morgan wrote, the planters separated poor whites from blacks by a "screen of racial comtempt." How did they do this? What laws were used? For example, laws that forbade poor whites and blacks to gather socially or to have children together. Also, blacks were forbidden to defend themselves physically from whites.
These laws created a new underclass of blacks. Previously, it was just money that defined the underclass. But by 1700, by force of laws created by the upper class, skin color defined social status. This was done for the express purpose of dividing and ruling the lower classes.
And the planters of virginia and maryland simply followed the example of the massive plantation colonies of the Caribbean. The upper class there had already had the same issues --poor white slaves and black slaves rebelling against the elite.
Now, that separation of the lower classes by the upper class defined american culture in a major way.
Eventually the white majority defeated chattel slavery in America.
And now the elite depend mainly on cheap imported labor to keep wages low and profits high.
But the elite of America still desire to divide the lower classes against each other. This is a natural desire. And part of how that is done is by use of the social status that white skin gives even lower class whites today. WEB Dubois called this added social status of whites a \"psychological wage.\" The elevated social status of white skin that still lingers from the infancy of america, that social status dividend helps keep the largest bloc of Americans--lower middle class whites--happy. It keeps them feeling that they are above the nonwhites.
Also, it keeps the lower middle class whites from joining politically with nonwhites. Divide et Impera has always been the core maxim for the upper class.
And lower middle class and lower class whites are still the major electoral force in America. Look at the census maps of america. You will see that aside from the east and west coast megacities, there are two hearts in america: one is the german heart that stretches from Pennsylvania through to around chicago. THe largest group here is white and mainly from germany, in terms of cultural and genealogical descent. This heart of America is really like a large city or tribe.
The other American heart is the Scots-Irish heart. It reaches from around west virginia down to around georgia-alabama area and forms a mega-tribe in a circle around the appalachian mountains. This white tribe-city is mainly descended from runaway white slaves.
These maps show what I mean:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Census-2000-Data-Top-US-Ancestries-by-County.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:USA-2000-population-density.gif
One major force in dividing up the lower class today is maintaining same racial divisions, even while forcing integration in the workforce in order to keep wages low though use of imported nonwhite labor.
Economic Leftist Populism is what the upper class fear, then as now. If the upper class can keep the white lower class majority from uniting and \"finding their common interests\" (to quote James Madison), they will better be able to keep away economic leftism populism.
Recall that I asked you why the fur of canadian foxes is thicker than fox fur in the South. Because northern foxes have evolved to have long fur in order to protect them from the cold, right? How does this happen? Is there a conspiracy to make northern fox fur thicker? Or is their fur a product of various forces exerted upon generations of foxes by the environment? Yes, the foxes evolved, and their fur is a result of these forces exerted by their external environment.
The same sort of dynamic is at play here in America. THe forces here are many and varied. But although all animals are created equal, some animals are more equal than others. Likewise, in america, some forces are stronger than others, and these strong forces have a much greater effect on our american culture.
Keep in mind what the elite would naturally desire, as they have always desired: a mixed population, separated by race and social status, with tensions between the factions, but integrated throughly in the work force and in the electorate, the better to stifle solidarity.
THAT is the fox fur we wear. And it is not the product of a conspiracy, but instead it is an evolved culture, a situation, a milieu, a mise en scene, a tableau, a dynamic--an ECOSYSTEM.
The forces of the elite are facilitated and aided and abetted by history and by the undemocratic American Constitution. This Constitution allows the forces of the rich and powerful to be better exerted, to make themselves more powerful. Those forces have evolved so as to do many things that favor the elite: stifle racial solidarity among the white lower class plurality (hence the unspoken taboo against white racial pride); engender and maintain racial tension (hence multiculturalism, political correctness, affirmative action shoved in the face of the white lower middle class); the sub rosa demonization of the whites, in particular the white blue collar male (aka The Evil Redneck).
All these cultural landmark are the products of forces exerted by the rich and powerful over decades, exerted in a number of ways, through nonprofit propaganda outlets such as the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, which have directly and indirectly created the PseudoLeftist propaganda regime, and through electoral politics, etc etc etc.
That is the fox fur we wear.
It is not a conspiracy. It is an ecosystem. Homo Sapiens is not separated from nature, not yet;, we are part and parcel of it. And this is our ecosystem, the ecosystem of Homo Sapiens Americanus.
Some links to support what I am saying:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kn2T6WKuEc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiEeok1EEl0&feature=related
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
